top of page

Leadership Philosophy

Image by Jehyun Sung
1253914255-2eefed28bbef43dd09c1aaf48c6e81d2.jpg

The Art of Servanthood

Servant leaders can go a mile than concentrate on the workforce: they could inspire them.
Indeed, in many methods, encouragement is the hallmark expression of a servant leader, and
it's miles a notably effective tool, professionals say. Servant leaders are a modern bunch—
they take the conventional energy management version and flip it absolutely upside down.
This new hierarchy places the people—or personnel, in a commercial enterprise context—on
the very pinnacle and the chief on the bottom, charged with serving the person above them.
And that is simply the manner servant leaders like it. That's because those leaders own a
serve-first mindset and they're centered on empowering and uplifting individuals who paint
for them.

Leadership Motivation

Role Profile

Good listener

Developing and Maintaining Valuable Relationships

Transformational


Transformational leaders bring change and movement to their organizations. These leaders aim to change the status quo by influencing people to buy into a new vision and new opportunities. People who become exceptional transformational leaders rely on authority and power to motivate and inspire them. A transformational leader's powerful influence, however, can also cause catastrophe. To maintain accountability, leaders and organizations need to stay within specific boundaries. Ultimately, transformational leaders provide new inspiration, new motivation, and new behaviours for their organizations. (Tucker and Russell, 2004). Teachers' satisfaction with transformational leadership was influenced by both direct and indirect effects through the occupation perceptions. (Bogler,2001).


Servant leadership


Rusell (2001) expounds on the values in leadership literature in terms of the trust, recognition of others, and empowerment as three aspects of servant leadership. A servant leader is guided by values. Servant leaders, in my opinion, differ fundamentally from other types of leaders
because of their leadership values. According to Van (2011), the role of servant leaders is to combine their need to serve with their motivation to lead. Individual characteristics and cultural characteristics go hand-in-hand with motivation. By empowering and developing
others, expressing humility, accepting interpersonal differences, being a steward, and providing direction, servant leadership is exhibited. In order to encourage self-actualization, positive job attitudes, performance, as well as greater attention to sustainability and corporate social responsibility, trust and fairness are expected to be the most important mediating processes.


Comparison of transformational leadership with a servant leader


Transformational leadership in addition to servant leadership can more effective within the organization. Servant leadership emphasizes the following characteristics that are tailored to the transformational components and are highlighted as follows with the scenario
when covid outburst with uncertainties. Servant leaders seek to achieve organizational goals by developing and unleashing the
creative potential of human resources SL represents a radical approach – it is humanistic and spiritual rather than rational and mechanistic; it puts workers rather than shareholders at the center of concentric circles, and it motivates workers primarily through creating a caring and
supportive workplace rather than through individual incentive systems.

Wong,et.al., (2007) states servant leadership focuses on
• As a servant leader, (a) exercising power in a humble and ethical manner,
• Assuring genuine relationships between leaders and followers, and
• It is important to create a positive and supportive workplace.
Servant leaders, however, are able to incorporate all of the positive aspects of other models of leadership except command-and-control dictatorship in the actual exercise of leadership. Amidst innumerable leadership within the organization, teachers and schools must be
carefully treated in a balanced space in turn to benefit the learners. Leadership that fosters transformation significantly impacts teacher innovation capability, both directly and through organizational learning. In the uncertain period of the era like a pandemic, more concentration should be given to individual needs wherein the emotional mental health is the concern to push for work for
teachers. So as the head of a government school, I preferred a transformational that fits in with
leadership for a change rather than transactional leadership.

References
Akpoviroro, K. S., Kadiri, B., & Owotutu, S. O. (2018). Effect of participative leadership style on employee’s productivity. International Journal of Economic Behavior (IJEB), 8(1), 47-60.
Anderson, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in education: A review of existing literature. International Social Science Review, 93(1), 1-13.
Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Transformational leadership and digital skills in higher education institutes: during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging science journal, 5(1), 1-15.
Bass, B.M., & Riggio, R.E. (2005). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology
Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational administration quarterly, 37(5), 662-683.
Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., & Menon, S. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 747-767.

Gul, R., & Khilji, G. (2021). Exploring the need for a responsive school curriculum to cope with the Covid-19 pandemic in Pakistan. Prospects, 51(1), 503-522.

Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of general psychology, 9(2), 169-180.

Kesting, P., Ulhøi, J. P., Song, L. J., & Niu, H. (2015). The impact of leadership styles on innovation-a review. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 22-41.

Khalid, A., Zafar, A., Zafar, M. A., Saqib, L., & Mushtaq, R. (2012). Role of supportive leadership as a moderator between job stress and job performance. Information Management
and Business Review, 4(9), 487-495.

Lumbasi, G. W., K’Aol, G. O., & Ouma, C. A. (2016). The effect of participative leadership style on the performance of coya senior managers in Kenya. pandemic. The impact of COVID19 on the international education system. Published: Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Raj, U., & Khare, S. (2020). The Indian education system in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of COVID19 on the international education system. Published: November 19th.

Richards, A. (2020). Exploring the benefits and limitations of transactional leadership in healthcare. Nursing Standard, 35(12), 46-50.

Russell, R. F. (2001). The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

Sharma, L., & Singh, S. K. (2013). Characteristics of laissez-faire leadership style: a case study. Clear International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 4(3).

Tavanti, M. (2008). Transactional leadership. Leadership: The key concepts, 166-170.

Tucker, B. A., & Russell, R. F. (2004). The influence of the transformational leader. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 103-111.

Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of management, 37(4), 1228-1261.

Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of experimental social psychology, 40(1), 1-13.

Wang, H., & Guan, B. (2018). The positive effect of authoritarian leadership on employee performance: The moderating role of power distance. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 357.

© 2022  Beaulah Paul. 

bottom of page